Publication

13 – Medium Term Financial Plan

Medium Term Financial Plan – 2018/19

In accordance with the Council’s Financial Regulations, this Medium Term Financial Plan sets out the financial projections, considerations, pressures and issues for the Council over the next five years. Each year the Plan will be updated, taking into consideration any new issues emerging and the continual alignment of funding with priorities determined by Council through its Corporate Strategy and Business Plan. The forecasts are linked with the Council’s Treasury Management Policy.

The objectives of the Plan are:
• To enable the Council to allocate resources to achieve its priorities
• To enable the Council to understand its key financial pressures and likely long term implications
of its decisions
• To identify future financial impacts of both policy decisions and external factors so that risks can
be managed
• To control precept rises and identify external funding.
• Support the delivery of value for money services
• To ensure good use is made of assets
• To maintain the General Reserve at or above the desired level.
• To provide for future financial demands
• To facilitate good financial management

The Medium Term financial position will be dominated by the priorities in Council’s Corporate Strategy which in turn takes account of the Newmarket Vision and the emerging Neighbourhood Plan, and public engagement. As development takes place in accordance with the emerging West Suffolk Local Plan, the Council Tax base will increase steadily which will in effect provide for increased Precept without increasing the charge unacceptably on individual homes.

Localism and austerity have been placing more emphasis on local communities helping themselves and raising more physical and financial resources locally. The Localism Act 2011, has given a wider role and increased powers to local councils, a number of which will require additional local funding. Government grant reductions for the principal authority will undoubtedly result in local service reductions which the Town Council may feel obliged to take up. The effects of the new Government in June 2017 and the EU referendum the previous year, on local government are as yet uncertain.

The Town Council’s Risk Assessment Process identifies risks associated with:
• Any inaccuracies in the forecast
• Difficulty in predicting costs for new projects
• Difficulty in predicting amount of additional income
• Low and uncertain investment income

The following guidelines are at the Core of the Plan:
• Maximise external funding opportunities in all areas
• Maximise the benefits of partnership working
• Review income opportunities
• Join with others when possible for procurement
• Maximise efficiencies to keep costs down

A central tenet of this plan is the introduction of annual contributions to a Rolling Capital programme. This will allow a flexible fund to be used on both internal capital items such as IT equipment or outside provisions such as play equipment or High Street regeneration. An indication of how it may build up, (with no call on it in early years) is shown in the table below. It is suggested that annual contributions commence from 2019/2020.

A council’s budget consists of two distinct elements, namely:
a. A Revenue element, incorporating the necessary funds to run the ongoing services to which the council is committed, and
b. A Capital element which must be sufficient to provide the level of resources necessary to maintain, and where necessary enhance, the council’s Capital Asset stock.

The first element is, by definition, relatively constant, being affected only by inflation and agreed changes in the level of service provision. It is likely however that this element will see significant increases in the future as principal authorities devolve services to Local Councils.

Capital budgeting, by contrast, can be subject to large movements in requirements as projects are identified and approved. Additionally, if projects are individually identified and budgeted for in a particular year, this can lead to protracted discussions as to which projects to include and which to leave out. The inherent fluctuations in Precept are regrettable, and to be avoided if at all possible.

Smoothing the effects of Capital
An increasingly common process for eliminating these Precept movements is for Local Councils to take a much longer view of their capital requirements, say over a five year rolling cycle.

This is achieved by budgeting on a Rolling Capital Fund basis. The medium-term requirement is equalised over the same medium term and included annually in the Precept calculation. No individual projects are actually included in the initial annual estimates, only the Rolling Fund requirement. On a continuous basis council then considers, approves and/or rejects individual projects as they are identified, justified and costed. The approval and timing of such projects can then be made based on priorities at the time of consideration, and also the availability of funds from the (known) source of capital funds flowing from the precept.

It follows from this concept that projects are only included in the council’s budget once approved and, since the source of funds is identified and agreed at the time of project approval, the use of such (previously earmarked) funds, together with any external funding that may be available, is also reflected as a credit budget and thus any effect on the council’s General Reserve (i.e. the Annual Surplus/Deficit) is entirely eliminated.

The likely increase for 2018/19 will be about predicted inflation, despite needing to redress the inadequate budget provision for the current year, to build up after a number of one of “realignment costs” and to commence funding the Corporate Strategy. An objective has been to contain precept rises

The following assumptions within inflation limits wherever possible have been made in preparing this Forecast:
• Fixed costs over which the Council have little control such as office costs are increased in line with inflation (currently very low) or actual predicted cost.
• Demand for grants from community organisations are likely to increase, as other funding reduces and needs increase. Partnership working is an important part of the Council’s strategy.
• The Precept Support grant has been discontinued by FHDC, which has resulted in an increase In precept in future years.
• DCLG will not cap precept rises for 2018/19, although they did consult over capping for the current year and it cannot be ruled out for the future.
• There is little prospect of support grant directly from Government or a share in increased business rates for the Town coming to the Town Council although NALC are currently lobbying hard for this to happen.
• Local funding opportunities will continue at a similar level, but we will continue to strive for grants and sponsorship.
• Staffing cost increases will be constrained but in line with national pay awards, likely to be 1% for the next 2 years, however there is pressure to ease this. Recognition of workload, level
of responsibility and local market pressures have been taken into account prior to the 2018/19 budget being set.
• A further provision has been made for 2018/19 to complete the Neighbourhood Plan, net of anticipated grant funding. It is important to develop a spending plan for this project.
• FHDC has not yet agreed a CIL policy but it is hoped that some benefit will be derived by the Town Council in due course. The share due to the Town Council would increase from 15% to 25% if it adopted a Neighbourhood Plan. No income has been included as it is far from certain.
• Increases in expenditure will inevitably necessitate appropriate increases in the General. Reserve and a minimum level is included. There is currently a surplus in this reserve, £5k of
which is earmarked to start off the Rolling Capital Reserve.
• There will be additional income from the Venues, as their use is developed and promoted and that some of this could be used for staff overtime payments or casual staff as needed for
events. The likely increased income has not been quantified.
• There is a need for the Council to borrow to part fund long term projects. It is believed there is adequate flexibility in provisions to accommodate such eventuality as well as scope for above inflation precept increases.
• The next Town Guide will remain self-funding.
• Support for “Legends of the Turf” and a heritage trail will come from the Rolling Capital fund.(RCF)
• Support for a Town Museum will come from community grants or RCF.
• Provision is made for funding a PCSO from October 2018.
• The Council’s contribution for Town Centre regeneration will come from the £13.2k EMR & RCF.
• Funding for additional open space would come from CIL or s106 contributions with commuted sums for maintenance.
• There will be an unquantified saving from electronic agendas and papers.
• Venues development and improvement will come from RCF.
• Refurbishment of the Jubilee clock will come from the existing EMR.
• New bus shelters would come from RCF.

To be Approved by Council 24th September 2018

EXPENDITURE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
F&P Insurance 12,041 12,000 12,180 12,485 12,797 13,117
F&P Legal Expenses 7,752 8,000 8,120 8,323 8,531 8,744
F&P Grants 5,320 8,000 8,120 8,323 8,531 8,744
F&P PCSO 0 32,000 34,000 34,850 35,721 36,614
F&P – PWLB Loan Repayments 33,995 0 0 0 0 0
F&P – Other Expenditure 86,208 45,875 46,562 47,726 48,919 50,142
F&P EXPENDITURE 145,316 105,875 108,982 111,707 114,499 117,362
LS PWLB Loan Repayments 33,995 68,000 88,919 91,142 93,421 95,756
LS Memorial Hall R&M 10,075 11,000 11,000 11,275 11,557 11,846
LS Memorial Hall Costs 29,806 27,450 27,999 28,699 29,416 30,152
LS Arts and Entertainment 23,493 22,450 26,532 27,195 27,875 28,572
LS Memorial Gardens 24,073 64,500 44,195 45,300 46,432 47,593
LS Cultural Exchange 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,588 3,677 3,769
LS Severals Facilities 16,158 11,950 12,129 12,432 12,743 13,062
LS EXPENDITURE 141,100 208,850 214,274 219,631 225,122 230,750
HR –  EXPENDITURE 134,885 165,465 167,800 171,995 176,295 180,702
D&P – EXPENDITURE 6,038 8,000 2,000 2,050 2,101 2,154
CS Outside Services SLA 58,138 67,515 68,500 70,213 71,968 73,767
CS Town Planting 11,993 10,050 10,050 10,301 10,559 10,823
CS – Cemetery R&M 19,742 9,000 9,135 9,363 9,597 9,837
CS Gravedigging 11,110 13,000 13,195 13,525 13,863 14,210
CS Cemetery SLA 8,880 8,880 9,031 9,257 9,488 9,725
CS Streetlighting 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,250 10,506 10,769
CS Christmas Lights 28,034 18,000 19,000 19,475 19,962 20,461
CS Other Expenditure 40,913 61,498 52,867 54,189 55,543 56,932
CS EXPENDITURE 188,810 197,943 191,778 196,572 201,487 206,524
TOTAL EXPENDITURE 616,149 686,133 684,834 701,955 719,504 737,491
 INCOME            
F&P-Precept 534,650 550,174 564,779 579,684 595,138 611,014
F&P – Other Income 1,636 250 254 260 267 274
F&P INCOME 536,286 550,424 565,033 579,944 595,405 611,288
LS Hall Hire Income 43,140 41,000 41,820 42,866 43,937 45,036
LS Severals Hire 8,293 8,000 8,120 8,323 8,531 8,744
LS Other Income 15,575 12,055 12,222 12,528 12,841 13,162
LS INCOME 67,008 61,055 62,162 63,716 65,309 66,942
HR INCOME       0 0 0
D&P INCOME       0 0 0
CS Cemetery Income 57,909 58,250 59,124 60,602 62,117 63,670
CS Other Income 34,847 16,395 17,540 17,979 18,428 18,889
CS INCOME 92,756 74,645 76,664 78,581 80,545 82,559
TOTAL INCOME 696,050 686,124 703,859 722,241 741,259 760,788
Income / Expenditure 79,901 -9 19,025 20,286 21,755 23,297
Change in Precept 16,024 15,524 14,605 14,905 15,454 15,876
  -0.58 2.90 2.65 2.64 2.67 2.67
Minimum General Reserve 85,813 102,920 102,725 105,293 107,926 110,624
Rolling Capital and EMRs 309,760 162,557 181,582 201,868 223,623 246,920
Total Equity 395,573 265,477 284,307 307,161 331,549 357,544